“i work for ecofarm. i want corporate sponsors. find me more ppl to target from agriculture/farming/etc related companies that'd be willing to fund us for our annual event.”
“find another 50 more. don't return any contacts if you don't have their emails.”
This second batch covers 50 new contacts at 39 agriculture, agtech and farm-media companies, researched on the live web on 2026-10-23. Every row carries a publicly printed professional email tied to the named person, and none of the addresses appeared in the first 50-contact batch — no blanks, no pattern-guessed addresses.
Fit score is a prospecting relevance heuristic (0–9) — a guide to who to approach first, not evidence or a probability that the person will sponsor EcoFarm. Hover a segment for the names behind it.
| Fit ↓ | Name | Title | Company | Why relevant | Source |
|---|
Fit score is only a prospecting relevance heuristic — how closely the person's role maps to sponsorship, marketing or partnership budgets — not evidence or a probability of willingness to fund EcoFarm. Several people use publicly listed Gmail addresses and some rows come from trade-media announcements or older directories, so revalidate titles and deliverability immediately before outreach, and keep outreach individualized and compliant with anti-spam and privacy rules.
Method: 50 corporate-sponsorship prospects (batch 2, contacts 51–100) for EcoFarm, compiled by live-web research on 2026-10-23 and deduplicated against the prior 50-contact batch by exact normalized email. Emails were kept only when publicly printed and linked to the named person. Fit score (0–9) measures prospecting relevance of the role, not willingness to sponsor. A source-diversity audit found the 50 rows rest on 37 independent hosts, the largest supporting 3 rows (6%), so no single host backs more than a small fraction. Role-type grouping on this page was derived from the sourced titles for navigation; the sourced title itself is in the table.