163 RAP candidates found across 62 of the ASX 100 — but the archival trail is thin

Asked:
collect all of the existing Reconciliation Action Plans (current and old) for the current asx100 companies.

A first-pass scan run on 2 September 2026 searched all 100 current S&P/ASX 100 constituents (FNArena constituent table) for Reconciliation Action Plans, current and historical. It located 163 distinct candidate RAP editions or edition references across 62 companies; the other 38 companies carry an explicit no-plan-located row. Only 31 candidates carry the strongest company-document metadata match, and dates are sparse: tentative logic classes 92 as current or possibly current and just 2 as clearly old — a reflection of missing dates, not of RAP history.

RAP editions on a timeline, where dates could be read

94 of the 163 candidates carry a usable start date (40 companies). A bar is drawn only when both start and end are stated; a diamond marks a start with no stated end — no dates are invented. Hover any mark for the plan and its source.

Current or possibly current Old / completed Future / not determinable Outlined mark = review-flagged evidence

Coverage across all 100 constituents

Candidate editions located per company. Grey tiles: no plan located in this scan (38 companies).

What the picture cannot say alone

Full inventory — 201 rows, one per candidate or explicit gap

Rows shaded orange are review-flagged: possible search contamination or ambiguous ownership — treat them as unverified leads. “PDF source” may be the RAP itself or a report referring to it. Company-source matching checks metadata consistency only; it does not prove a link is a standalone RAP PDF.

TickerCompanyPlan titleTypeStartEndStatusConfidenceSource

Method: scan run 2026-09-02 over the 100 current S&P/ASX 100 constituents captured from the FNArena constituent table. Each company was searched with exact-company PDF queries plus current/previous/archive RAP queries; candidates were deduplicated by company and edition wording, and dates were tentatively inferred from titles, so status counts (92 current or possibly current, 2 old/completed, 69 future or not determinable) reflect sparse dates, not RAP history. “Strong” means direct document metadata matches the company; it does not prove the link is a standalone RAP PDF — many links are annual or sustainability reports referring to a RAP. Review-flagged rows need manual validation. Archival discovery is incomplete: old RAP PDFs are frequently removed, renamed, or survive only as mentions in annual reports. All 201 rows are shown; nothing was cut.

This report was generated automatically by Keenable SELECT at a user's request, from publicly available web sources linked herein. Keenable does not review, verify, or endorse its contents and makes no representation as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness; AI-based extraction may contain errors. Nothing in this report is investment, legal, financial, or other professional advice. All trademarks and referenced content remain the property of their respective owners; no affiliation or endorsement is implied. To report an error, rights concern, or request removal: legal@keenable.ai.

Keenable SELECTAsk your own question
Made with Keenable SELECT