Three of five free X sentiment tools clear the no-card bar; two need a signup check

Asked (summary):

Find currently active, completely free (or unmetered free demo / public dashboard / no-credit-card free tier) online tools that run sentiment analysis on X (formerly Twitter), where entering a public figure's name or handle — a politician such as Jarosław Kaczyński or Emmanuel Macron — returns a positive/neutral/negative breakdown and a sentiment score over time.

A strict research pass as of 11 November 2026 found 5 currently presented, usable candidates across 5 independent hosts (one source page each). Three — Lumen by Talkwalker, the NCSU Tweet Sentiment Visualization dashboard, and the Xpoz social-sentiment-analyzer — are clearly within the requested access standard; AllyHub and Circleboom look free but their pages do not state whether a credit card is required at signup.

Qualification matrix: what each tool gives a public-figure query

meets the requirement partial — works with a caveat verify at signup — the page does not say

Hover or tap a cell for the evidence behind each judgment. A missing credit-card statement is marked "verify", never assumed to mean no card.

The NCSU dashboard is the only zero-signup option: type a keyword and get a pleasure–arousal plot, topic clusters, a heatmap and a pleasant-vs-unpleasant timeline over recent tweets. csc2.ncsu.edu

Lumen by Talkwalker gives the closest match to a marketer-style breakdown — sentiment, reach and trends in one free search — but only over seven days of data and a limited set of sources, after an email signup. talkwalker.com

Xpoz is the only candidate with an explicit no-credit-card statement: 500 one-time credits, 2 per X query, roughly 250 free analyses — but it runs as an agent skill, not a point-and-click dashboard. xpoz.ai

AllyHub and Circleboom both advertise ongoing free tiers with true positive/negative/neutral splits, yet neither page states whether a credit card is required — verify at signup before relying on them. circleboom.com

How to test a politician across these tools

Query the exact full name in quotes OR the @handle — e.g. "Jarosław Kaczyński" OR @handle — and add language variants with and without diacritics ("Jaroslaw Kaczynski") plus exclusions for unrelated namesakes.
Run the same short date window (seven days fits every free tier here) in each tool before comparing numbers; windows and sources differ, so cross-tool scores are only comparable on matched windows.
Treat every result as a sample, not a census: protected, deleted and login-gated posts, API and index limits, sarcasm, multilingual text, bots and name ambiguity can all materially bias the split.

All five candidates, row by row

Tool	Accepted input	Sentiment outputs	Free access	Key limitation	Source

Method: 5 tool rows gathered in a strict web research pass dated 2026-11-11, one source URL per tool across 5 independent hosts (largest single-URL share 20%). Matrix cells grade each tool against the asked use case — name/handle input, positive/neutral/negative output, trend over time, no-card free access, and dashboard friction — from the wording on each source page only. Long output and limitation text is shown in full in the table; nothing was cut.

This report was generated automatically by Keenable SELECT at a user's request, from publicly available web sources linked herein. Keenable does not review, verify, or endorse its contents and makes no representation as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness; AI-based extraction may contain errors. Nothing in this report is investment, legal, financial, or other professional advice. All trademarks and referenced content remain the property of their respective owners; no affiliation or endorsement is implied. To report an error, rights concern, or request removal: legal@keenable.ai.