The rows cover 78 months of English Wikipedia pageviews for the “Human Design” article (February 2020 – July 2026, in monthly reader views), 79 dated ecosystem milestones from 1995 to 2026 (plus 21 pre-1995 origin rows used only as context), three search-interest observations and 40 growth-signal pages. No continuous comparable index exists before 2020, so the 1995–2019 story is reconstructed from dated publishing, training and app milestones.
Reader views of the “Human Design” article, February 2020 – July 2026. This measures curiosity — people looking the system up — not the number of adherents. Hover or tap the chart for exact monthly values.
79 dated milestones: books, trainings, websites, apps, social media and AI-era products. Colour marks source quality — independent platform statistics vs self-reported or promotional claims. Hover or tap a dot for the milestone and its source.
Selected from 40 pages reporting growth, audience and market signals. Independent platform statistics are the most trustworthy; press releases and practitioners' own numbers are labelled self-reported.
| Date | Milestone | Audience metric | Source type | Source |
|---|
Method: 78 monthly English Wikipedia pageview counts (Wikimedia REST API, all-access, user agent, Feb 2020–Jul 2026, one number = reader views of the “Human Design” article that month), 100 dated milestone rows (79 from 1995 on shown; 21 pre-1995 origin rows omitted for scope), 3 search-interest observations and 40 growth-signal pages, all scanned 2026-09-22 from web search, Wikimedia, Google Trends commentary, app and platform pages, archives and market analytics. Pageviews proxy information-seeking, not adherents; Google Books Ngram was excluded because “human design” is ambiguous in print; milestone texts trimmed to 160 characters; doctrinal population percentages are not treated as interest measures.