“anything i'm missing here? anything here info is outdated? i only want to target customers using splunk today.”
“am i missing any confirmed splunk customers today in the states of california, arizona, hawaii, nevada, and alaska and new mexico?”
This scan audited 32 organizations with public Splunk evidence across California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Alaska and Hawaii — 25 missing from your account list and 7 already on it. Evidence spans 2025–2026 procurement records, active official job postings, customer stories and technical documents; 13 of the missing accounts meet a strict “current operational evidence” standard. Public evidence cannot reveal every private Splunk contract, so this is not a complete universe.
| Account | State | Status | Evidence date | Source type | Evidence | Source |
|---|
Method: 32 audited rows of public Splunk-use evidence for organizations headquartered or based in CA, AZ, NV, NM, AK and HI — 25 missing from the supplied account list, 7 already present. Each row carries one independent source URL; evidence dates run 2025–2026 where shown, and undated rows are flagged “verify first.” A number on the map counts accounts per state by status. Aggregator-sourced rows are kept distinct from official sources; remote-job and expired evidence was downgraded. Evidence text is trimmed for space in the table.