Pixel + GrapheneOS leads on both counts; kill-switch Linux phones win privacy but trail badly on security

Asked:

“what are the top 20 phones in the world based on privacy and privacy only ?”

Asked (follow-up):

“now rank these on privacy with 1-10 score and also another ranking for security 1-10 score all in simple chart with side notes please and thank you!”

Ten phone + OS configurations, each scored 0–10 for privacy and separately for security under one rubric, from 467 evidence pages across many independent hosts (188 host citations in total). Scores are current as of 2026-09-17. Ties in rank are shown as ties.

Privacy /10Security /10thin evidence base (≤4 hosts)
Privacy and security diverge most on the Librem 5 + PureOS: 9.1 privacy against 4.8 security, for lack of verified boot and app sandboxing. wiki.puri.sm
The current iPhone + iOS is the mirror case: second-best security (8.4) but 6.6 privacy, held back by first-party telemetry and closed source. support.apple.com
F(x)tec Pro1 X + Ubuntu Touch is last on both scores (6.5 / 3.0): production has ceased and ongoing security support is uncertain. ubports.com
Evidence depth varies widely: Fairphone 6 CalyxOS rests on 3 pages from 2 hosts, versus 209 pages from 52 hosts for the Librem 5. en.wikipedia.org

How the scores are built

Privacy /10 weighs equally: first-party data minimization and cloud independence; anti-tracking and permissions; physical hardware privacy; and transparency with owner control.

Security /10 weighs equally: verified boot and bootloader protection; app isolation; exploit mitigations; encryption and secure hardware; and complete, timely security updates.

Missing or undocumented protections lose points; marketing claims get no unsupported credit. Privacy-related security is scored only in the security column to avoid double-counting as far as possible.

Cautions. Scores are evidence-based editorial comparisons, not laboratory certifications. A 10 means best conceivable under this rubric — not anonymous, invulnerable, or free of carrier location metadata. Your threat model can change the best choice: hardware kill switches matter more for sensor and radio control, while verified boot and sandboxing matter more against device compromise. Installation state matters too — an unlocked bootloader or stale patches can materially lower a configuration's real score.

All ten configurations

Privacy rankConfigurationPrivacy /10Security rankSecurity /10Side noteSource

Method: 10 phone + OS configurations scored 0–10 for privacy and security under a fixed rubric (equal-weight criteria listed above), from 467 evidence pages across independent hosts; scores current as of 2026-09-17. Ranks with equal scores are shown tied. Rows shaded amber rest on 4 or fewer independent hosts. Evidence-page and host counts per row appear on hover in the chart. One long iPhone and one long F(x)tec configuration name are shortened for display; scores unchanged.

This report was generated automatically by Keenable SELECT at a user's request, from publicly available web sources linked herein. Keenable does not review, verify, or endorse its contents and makes no representation as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness; AI-based extraction may contain errors. Nothing in this report is investment, legal, financial, or other professional advice. All trademarks and referenced content remain the property of their respective owners; no affiliation or endorsement is implied. To report an error, rights concern, or request removal: legal@keenable.ai.

Keenable SELECTAsk your own question
Made with Keenable SELECT