Asked for 1,000 VC-funded Firecrawl subprocessor listings; live-web research found 18 candidates — and a third of their funding matches look like name collisions

Asked:

“list of 1000 VC funded companies who list firecrawl in their subprocessor page / DPA”

The scan, current as of 2026-11-04, surfaced 124 plausible organization-owned legal, privacy, DPA or subprocessor pages that mention Firecrawl; automated matching against funding sources produced 18 candidate overlaps out of the 1,000 requested — no comprehensive registry of subprocessor disclosures exists, so a verified universe of 1,000 could not be substantiated. Funding here means venture or institutional startup equity, excluding debt-only funding, grants and crowdfunding. Review of the 18 rows splits them evenly: 6 direct matches, 6 ambiguous, and 6 likely name collisions where the funding evidence describes a different company. This page is a partial candidate audit, not a verified list.

Identity-match confidence across the 18 candidates

Each block is one candidate company, placed by how well its funding evidence matches the company on the legal page. Hover or tap a block for the reason.

Direct match — funding source clearly names the same company (6) Ambiguous — sparse or unconfirmed identity (6) Likely name collision — evidence describes a different company (6)

Three collisions are explicit in the evidence text: Mindlet’s funding row is about “Circuit Mind”, PersonaFlow’s is about cybersecurity firm “Persona”, and Plume’s describes a geospatial-data startup, not the SEO tool on plumeseo.com.

The strongest match is Bookipi, whose $1.6M seed announcement sits on the same domain as its privacy policy — bookipi.com.

The largest claimed figure, $634M for Stark Chat, rests on a sparse Tracxn entry for “STARK” — a common name — and stays ambiguous: tracxn.com.

Only 7 of the 18 disclosures are formal DPA or subprocessor pages (e.g. tryklaro.app); the rest mention Firecrawl inside privacy policies or terms.

All 18 candidate rows

Company	Status	Funding claim	Firecrawl use	Legal page	Funding source

Method: 18 candidate rows from a live-web scan current as of 2026-11-04, drawn from 124 organization-owned legal/privacy/DPA/subprocessor pages mentioning Firecrawl and matched against public funding sources. Funding figures are as stated by each cited source and mean venture/institutional equity only (no debt, grants or crowdfunding); they are unverified. Status (direct / ambiguous / likely collision) was assigned by comparing each row’s funding title and quoted evidence against the legal-page company. Full quoted evidence text was trimmed for space; both source URLs per row are linked.

This report was generated automatically by Keenable SELECT at a user's request, from publicly available web sources linked herein. Keenable does not review, verify, or endorse its contents and makes no representation as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness; AI-based extraction may contain errors. Nothing in this report is investment, legal, financial, or other professional advice. All trademarks and referenced content remain the property of their respective owners; no affiliation or endorsement is implied. To report an error, rights concern, or request removal: legal@keenable.ai.