Users call Keenable fast and sensible; benchmarks agree on speed and cost but show quality varies by task
Asked:
“Find me verbatim feedback on keenable ai”
A curated public-web sample — not an exhaustive census — of 16 verbatim excerpts about Keenable AI from 4 hosts: 5 direct user comments on Keenable SELECT and 11 independent benchmark statements on Keenable Search. Most benchmark excerpts come from KrabArena/KrabReview pages; no single URL supplies more than 4 of the 16 rows. Pages exposed no reliable publication dates.
Every excerpt, by who said it and how it lands
positive (4)mixed (7)negative (3)neutral (2)Hover or tap a tile to read the full quote
What the tiles cannot say
The sharpest user complaint is a lost 10-line query during Google sign-in on Firefox/macOS — a workflow bug, not a search-quality one. news.ycombinator.com
Benchmarks repeatedly single out speed and price — 198–723 ms p50 latencies and about $1/1K calls — even in tests Keenable loses. krabarena.com
Quality is domain-dependent: 100% sufficient coverage on prediction-market queries and a 10–9 win on M&A retrieval, but 3% product-page rate on shopping queries and last place on fresh news. krabarena.com
One neutral finding shifts the blame: search APIs cluster at 58–62% on deep research, so the agent loop, not the API, is the lever to the frontier. krabarena.com
Read the quotes
All 16 rows
Quote
Type
Sentiment
Aspect
Source
Curated public-web sample of 16 verbatim excerpts about Keenable AI (5 user comments on Keenable SELECT, 11 independent benchmark statements on Keenable Search) from 4 hosts; the largest single URL supplies 4 rows. Quotes preserved exactly, including spelling and punctuation; sentiment and aspect assigned during curation. Pages exposed no reliable publication dates. Nothing cut for space.