Zero of 25 requested strict-qualified contacts were proven — 12 candidates screened, none passed every rule

Asked (summary):

Build a list of 25 US software vendors (51–500 employees; selling to K-12, higher ed, libraries, or enterprise) with no publicly available VPAT/ACR (or request-only), and for each identify a named sales-side decision maker (CRO, VP Sales, Head of Sales, Director of Sales, VP Marketing, VP Revenue, Chief Commercial Officer, or similar qualifying title) whose real individual email is literally published. Titles must be verified on the vendor's own site; emails must not be inferred. Include excluded and unresolved vendors.

The screening audit covers 12 candidate contacts out of the 25 requested — the rows that survived an initial US-software / education-or-enterprise and literally-published-email screen. None of the 12 fully satisfied every strict condition: 2 were excluded for a public VPAT/ACR, 3 for headcount outside 51–500, 1 has unresolved headcount, and 6 near-matches lack vendor-own-site verification of the contact's current title. Emails shown were literally present in fetched source text.

Screening funnel: where each of the 12 candidates stopped

Accelerate Education and Newsela were excluded because each publishes a VPAT/ACR — Newsela's is a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.1 conformance report PDF. go.newsela.com
Civitas Learning is the one explicit request-only vendor — its accessibility page says VPATs "can be provided" — but Peter Christian's current title was not verified on the vendor's own site. civitaslearning.com
PaySchools, Verity IQ and WorldView Software fell outside the 51–500 employee band by surfaced headcount; STOPit Solutions' headcount could not be resolved at all. pcamerica.org
All six remaining near-matches carry LinkedIn-only or third-party title evidence — for example Tovuti's CRO and Plurilock's VP of Sales — which does not meet the vendor-own-site title rule. linkedin.com

Evidence table: all 12 screened rows, grouped by strict-screen status

#CompanyHQEmployeesSegmentContactTitleEmailSourcesVPAT resultStrict-screen status

Screening audit of 12 candidate US software-vendor sales contacts (of 25 requested), one row per contact, gathered from vendor pages, procurement contract PDFs, government and education directories, LinkedIn profiles, and other published directories. "No public VPAT surfaced" reflects indexed-web searches for VPAT/ACR pages, request-only wording, and PDFs — not a completed four-path direct-fetch certification — so those rows are not definitive proof of absence. Employee counts are as published by the cited sources. VPAT evidence notes were shortened for space; all emails and titles are quoted verbatim from fetched source text. No personal information beyond already-published professional names and work emails is included.

This report was generated automatically by Keenable SELECT at a user's request, from publicly available web sources linked herein. Keenable does not review, verify, or endorse its contents and makes no representation as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness; AI-based extraction may contain errors. Nothing in this report is investment, legal, financial, or other professional advice. All trademarks and referenced content remain the property of their respective owners; no affiliation or endorsement is implied. To report an error, rights concern, or request removal: legal@keenable.ai.

Keenable SELECTAsk your own question
Made with Keenable SELECT